What's Up With Nietzsche?
After bumming around all of Fall break, what a relief it was to come back to existentialism with some light topics: the death (nay, the murder) of God and the nature of truth.
Is God dead? And did we kill him? If God is in fact dead, we certainly must have killed him. Humans, after all, are the only animals known to worship any deity, so only we can kill God. There seems to be at least two parts to the death of God: the spiritual and the practical.
In the story, the spiritual is what the madman seems to think we have killed. We have all killed the sacred, moral relationship we had with a benevolent God. Nowadays, it seems that times have changed and religion does not provide the same moral backbone it once did. Not as many people go to church and the spirituality that is practiced tends to be less organized. When Nietzsche wrote this, he also was in the beginnings of a shift in society’s values and the importance religion played in those values.
But the personal relationship individuals have with God is only a fraction of what makes religion. Religion is a social institution with great power and influence. Like government or school or even norms about what is acceptable in public, the social institution of religion has influence over us regardless of whether we personally agree with its core meaning. It is precisely this influence that the so-called atheists have not escaped. Though they have no belief, they are operating under the institution as if they are Christian. Nietzsche wants us to escape our “herd instinct” and go live our truth (the call to action is pretty confusing). One person pointed out the painting of Nietzsche as the “quintessential nihilist” by some people. I didn’t really get that from either of the texts. But the same person pointed out that Nietzsche maybe doesn’t believe in there being no moral “truths” but rather that we can create our own morality. So maybe I see the nihilism. So yeah? God might be dead. But religion is a very powerful and very convenient way to make people behave.
Moving on from that, what is truth? Is there objective truth? Is everything subjective? Is what’s true for me different from what’s true for you?
I want to start off by standing by my claim that yes, there are objective truths. And some of those probably are objective moral truths (though maybe not). But the class isn’t about me. What does Nietzsche think?
The quote I think best summarizes this reading is “there are many sets of eyes. Even the sphinx has eyes—and consequently there are many kinds of “truths,” and consequently there is no truth.”
Perspective is clearly very important to Nietzsche’s understanding of truth. According to him, every set of eyes provides a different “truth.” But since every truth is different there is no universal, set truth. Or at least, we don’t have the ability to understand the truth as it actually is because we can only see it through our perspective.
Here's a song I like
Comments
Post a Comment