Dostoevsky Reflection: Freedom and Utopia's
Feodor Dostoevsky’s Notes from the Underground was one of my
favorite readings since Camus. I was most intrigued by the speaker’s take on
free will and how that had to do with him refusing to seek treatment for his
illness.
There is something in
human nature that seems to drive us to self-destruct just because we can. It’s
hard to talk about because it’s at times so obviously irrational or selfish
that we cannot avoid trying to justify it to ourselves. We tell ourselves we are
not going to the doctor because it’s too expensive or we’re too busy or we
don’t trust doctors. Sometimes these are in fact our true reasons, but other
times we say things like this because it would be ridiculous to explain that we
are risking our own lives out of spite.
Spite for who? Our doubt?
I don’t know if we have
free will, though I am inclined to say that we do. But the scariest part of
that question for me is not the idea that maybe we don’t have free will, but
the fact that there is any doubt at all. Knowing that everything I do is
determined would be scary, but then at least I’d know for sure. And that’s why
this reading struck such a cord with me. It is those moments when we know we
are acting with complete disregard for rationality, knowing full well we are
making the wrong decision, that we tend to feel the most in control. Because in
our lives, there’s almost always a more rational path to take. If we make every
decision based on what is more rational, that really does not feel like
freedom. So it’s those moments we rebel that we feel we are proving to
ourselves that we are free.
I don’t think that making
bad decisions on purpose is actually anymore of an exercise of free will than
making good decisions on purpose. If we have free will, I think we could
certainly freely make the most rational decisions all the time and still be
free actors. But there’s a reason it doesn’t feel that way. There’s a reason
our supposed rebellion can make us feel so in control.
And this is why when we
asked the question in class “can a utopia exist” I was so quick in my mind to
dismiss that idea. But other people were not as eager to write this off, and
I’m glad, because after a couple of people were open-minded to the idea, I was
convinced too. Theoretically, a utopia could exist. It’s hard to say what
exactly that would look like, but it’s possible. But the reason I felt so much
tension with it was because it would require us to give up a lot of freedom.
And that might be for the better! And if I’m being honest with myself, there is
not a single society in the world that doesn’t require us to give up certain
freedoms to live cooperatively in it. Because what we don’t like to admit about
freedom is total freedom is contradictory. Certain freedoms necessarily take away
other freedoms. But it’s not about what we logically know, it’s about what we
feel. And for humans, sometimes feeling free is more important than actually
being free.
Comments
Post a Comment